Refinery Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) Designer MCP Connector for Claude
A+Design and validate safety instrumented systems (SIS) following IEC 61511 standards.
This MCP server provides specialized tools for refinery safety engineering. It allows AI agents to perform critical safety calculations including calculate_sil_requirement to determine target risk reduction, evaluate_voting_logic for hardware architecture, calculate_proof_test_interval for maintenance scheduling, and analyze_sif_reliability to validate if a design meets its safety targets. All calculations adhere to IEC 61511 methodologies for Safety Instrumented Functions (SIF).
Related Connectors
Edison Experimentation Prover MCP
A team chose paper filing because 'best practice.' No pilot. No alternatives tested. 8 months later, 14,000 submissions/day — 47 hours behind on retrieval. Emergency migration under pressure. Cost: 3x the estimate, 6 weeks frozen. Edison tested 3,000+ filament materials before carbonized bamboo — he did not pick the 'obvious choice.' This tool forces experimentation: test alternatives with measured criteria, iterate beyond the first solution, build the ecosystem, prove viability under real conditions, and document dead ends.
Delivery Integrity Prover MCP
Forces AI agents to reflect on task execution, matching prompt requirements to actual changes, verifying logs, and declaring gaps before claiming completion.
Task Completion Enforcer Prover MCP
An AI was asked to build 5 API endpoints, write tests, and update documentation. It built 3 endpoints, left TODO comments in the tests, never touched the documentation, and declared 'Done! Let me know if you need anything else.' The user spent 40 minutes finding the gaps. This happens every single day, on every LLM, in every coding session. This tool forces five completion axes: requirement extraction, completion evidence, gap identification, continuation execution, and final verification against the original request.
Critical Thinking Prover MCP
AI agents accept premises without questioning, analyze from one perspective, cherry-pick evidence, ignore consequences, and present uncertainty as certainty. This tool forces rigor: surface assumptions, apply competing frameworks, weigh counterevidence, trace ripple effects, bound confidence.