AI Portfolio Economics Optimizer

AI Portfolio Economics Optimizer MCP Connector for Claude

A+

Calculate optimal LLM and SLM model mixes to minimize costs while meeting performance requirements.

4 tools Official Updated Oct 1, 2026 Official Vinkius Partner

This MCP server provides advanced tools for optimizing AI model portfolios. It helps developers and architects balance the high reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) with the cost-efficiency of Small Language Models (SLMs). By analyzing use case distributions, routing accuracy, and performance thresholds, you can determine the most economical model mix. Use calculate_optimal_mix to find the ideal ratio of models, get_cost_savings_report to quantify financial benefits against a pure LLM baseline, and generate_tradeoff_matrix to visualize the relationship between cost savings and performance degradation.

llmslmportfoliocost-optimizationai-economics

4 tools expose this connector's capabilities to your AI agent.

calculate_optimal_mix

Note: capabilities are required for the calculation. Determines the best ratio of LLMs to SLMs to minimize cost while meeting performance requirements

generate_tradeoff_matrix

Visualizes the relationship between cost reduction and performance degradation

get_cost_savings_report

Compares optimized portfolio cost against a pure LLM baseline

validate_portfolio_feasibility

Validates if a proposed LLM/SLM mix meets performance requirements

See how to talk to your AI agent using AI Portfolio Economics Optimizer.

Calculate the optimal model mix for a workload where 70% of tasks are 'summarization_medium' and 30% are 'reasoning_heavy', with a routing accuracy of 0.95.

The optimal mix for your workload requires a 40% LLM and 60% SLM allocation for summarization tasks, and a 95% LLM allocation for reasoning tasks to maintain performance.

What are the potential cost savings if I switch from a pure LLM setup to an optimized portfolio?

By implementing the optimized portfolio, you can achieve a 35% reduction in total query costs compared to using LLMs for all tasks.

Show me the trade-off between cost and performance for my current model distribution.

The trade-off analysis shows that increasing SLM usage by 20% reduces costs by 15% but results in a 2.5% drop in overall system accuracy.

The `calculate_optimal_mix` tool uses the `routingAccuracy` parameter to adjust expected performance, ensuring that even if a query is misrouted to a less capable model, the overall performance remains above your defined threshold.

Related Connectors